Saturday, November 16, 2013

Common Core Cliff Notes

Common Core Cliff Notes:

I don’t believe there has been a more confusing or chaotic time in public education than the past few years- at least in New York! It becomes difficult for those of us who are not professional educators to navigate the challenges coming at us in the midst of all this change, so here is my cheat sheet:

Common Core:
A set of National Education standards adopted by 45 states, not a curriculum but a set of expectations. 

This came from the CCSS website:

The Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort that established a single set of clear educational standards for kindergarten through 12th grade in English language arts and mathematics.  The standards are designed to ensure that students graduating from high school are prepared to enter credit bearing entry courses in two or four year college programs or enter the workforce. The standards provide a clear understanding of the expectations in reading, writing, speaking and listening, language and mathematics in school.

The nation’s governors and education commissioners, through their representative organizations the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) led the development of the Common Core State Standards and continue to lead the initiative. Teachers, parents, school administrators and experts from across the country together with state leaders provided input into the development of the standards.


APPR
Annual Professional Performance Review- the framework within which teachers and administrators are evaluated.

RTTT
Race to the Top- a federal grant for which New York State applied. Acceptance of the grant required that certain initiatives be in place to be eligible. The short list is that states who won RTTT grants were awarded points for satisfying certain educational policies, such as performance-based standards (often referred to as an Annual professional performance review- APPR) for teachers and principals, complying with the Common Core standards, lifting caps on charter schools, turning around the lowest-performing schools, and building data systems.

This is how RTTT has been operationalized in New York State via the Regents Reform Agenda:

1.  Implementing Common Core standards and developing curriculum and assessments aligned to these standards to prepare students for success in college and the workplace

2.  Building instructional data systems that measure student success and inform teachers and principals how they can improve their practice in real time.

3.  Recruiting, developing, retaining, and rewarding effective teachers and principals.

4.  Turning around the lowest-achieving schools.



Complaints have been made about the developmental appropriateness of the standards in the early years- I have heard many teachers, on the other hand, tend to agree that the standards themselves support higher order thinking skills and shift from a broad coverage of content to a narrower but deeper understanding of material at each grade level. Not necessarily a bad thing.

Most of the pushback to these changes comes from the pace at which they are being implemented, which is certainly ahead of the states ability to provide support to local districts. All districts have had to provide (and pay for) Common Core training for their staff as well as training on the new APPR model- also paid for by each district. In Warwick, these initiatives have cost us approximately $600,000 over the past two years.

For districts that chose to rely on the State developed modules to deliver curriculum aligned to the common core, the past year has been frustrating to say the least. The modules that the state developed to support the Common Core Standards have been months behind in their rollout, in some cases modules were published in the spring for material that had already covered in the previous fall. Here in Warwick our teachers selected our own common core aligned resources and materials which are not dependent on the state’s supporting materials.  However, teachers are using the modules as supplemental resources.

In addition, the state decided to test students against the common core standards before there had been time to fully integrate them into curriculum, hence the drop in last years test scores across the state. This has created enormous frustration for students and teachers, so parents and educators have been voicing their concerns across the state. However, the increase in testing is actually connected more to APPR  than the Common Core Standards themselves. Implementation of the new APPR plan requires additional testing in order to evaluate teachers and administrators. It’s important to recognize what the three components are (Common Core Standards, APPR and RTTT) on their own and how they are tied together for student outcomes.

For an excellent outline of these issues read the New York Council of School Superintendents report on State Education policy.

Submitted by Lynn Lillian